Northwestern Polytechnical University (Xian, China) organized a conference themed Human Civilization and Culture Forum.
In this conference Prof. S. Mavroudeas (Dept. of Social Policy, Panteion University) participated as invited speaker and presented a paper titled “De-globalization and the return of the theory of Imperialism’.
The 2023 World Association of Political Economy (WAPE) Forum took place in Pingtan city (Fudgian province, China). In this forum I presented a paper titled ‘Once Again On The Alledged Differences Between Marx and Engels’.
The paper confronts the attacks by many older and newer anti-Engelsionists (prominent among them M.Heinrich and D.Harvey) against Engels and it refutes their allegations that (a) Engels has falsified Marx’s thought, (b) Das Kapital was an unfinished and unfinishable work and (c) there is no unity in Marxism but instead many ‘marxisms’ exist.
The paper has already been published in International Critical Thought (ICT). The links for downloading are given below.
https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/MVWEWCQZFTQVPIKZDJYA/full?target=10.1080/21598282.2020.1829981
Another relevant article regarding Engels’ contribution to Marxist Political Economy can be found here: https://stavrosmavroudeas.wordpress.com/2020/07/08/friedrich-engels-and-his-contribution-to-marxism-by-s-mavroudeas-human-geography/
SUFE (the Shanghai University of Economics and Finance) organised at Dishoui Lake an one-day conference on issues concerning the Chinese modernisation.
I participate in this conference as an invited speaker and presented a paper analysing ‘The Adventures of Economic Policy within Mainstream Economics‘.
The V Moscow Academic Economic Forum (2023 MAEF) was held on 7-8 June 2023, organised by the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), the Russian Free Economic Society (VEO of Russia) and the International Union of Economists (IUE)
Part of the Forum was the VII International Political Economy Congress (IPEC-2023), that took place at the Faculty of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University
S.Mavroudeas (Panteion University, Dept. of Social Policy) was invited speaker in the Forum.
He presented a paper titled ‘Was I.I.Rubin a ‘Rubinist’? – Failures of the value-form and Neue Marx Lekture approaches’
The paper’s summary is the following:
Abstract
I.I.Rubin’s Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value played a crucial role in the 1970s Value Debate between Marxist and neo-Ricardians as it gave inspiration and support to the Marxist argument about the social dimension of the political-economic analysis and also about the difference between Marx’s and Ricardo’s Labour Theory of Value. However, the subsequent ‘Rubinists’ overemphasized the social dimension and neglected the technical dimension of value. This led to a theory of form without content by identifying immediately value with money and thus abandoning labour values and substituting them with monetary prices. The old ‘Rubinists’ betrayed both Marx and Rubin as the latter never ascribed to their fallacies. Nowadays, a new stream of ‘Rubinists’ (e.g., the proponents of a monetary theory of value) appear that again identify immediately labour values with money and thus also make labour values redundant. This paper argues that the new ‘Rubinists’ betray also both Marx and Rubin and, moreover, fail to understand the essential working of the capitalist economy.
Selected and revised papers from the proceedings of the ICOPEC 2021 Conference have been published by IJOPEC Publications in a collective volume titled ‘The Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on societies and economies’.
I was an invited speaker at the conference and I contributed a paper titled ‘The Political Economy of the COVID-19 Pandemic’, which is included in this collective volume.
The links to my paper are the following:
https://www.academia.edu/67434478/The_political_economy_of_the_covid_19_pandemic_IJOPEC_2021
The whole e-book can be assesed at IJOPEC’s website: http://www.ijopec.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2021_08.pdf
EURAS organises an online conference (Wednesday, December 8th) on the ‘Social Consequences of Covid-19 Pandemic in Turkey and the World’.
I will present a paper on ‘The Political Economy of the COVID-19 Pandemic’.
Presentation at the International Conference «Soviet Union: An Alternative of the Past, or a Strategic Project for the Future?», National Library of Russia, Plekhanov House, Association for Marxist Social Sciences, Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, 12-13/11/2021
The National Library of Russia, the Plekhanov House, the Association for Marxist Social Sciences and the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation are organising an international conference in St.Petersburg (12-13 November 2021) titled ‘Soviet Union: An Alternative of the Past, or a Strategic Project for the Future?’
I will present a paper titled ‘‘Soviet Union: socio-economic type, collapse and lessons for the future’.
The abstract of my paper is the following.
ABSTRACT
According to Marxism class struggle is the mechanism explaining the evolution of class divided societies. This paper argues that the Soviet Union (SU) was a transitional to socialism but not a socialist socio-economic formation. As such it was characterized by internal class struggle between a latent bourgeoisie (to a great extent reborn within the ranks of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union – CPSU) and the working class. This transitional state of affairs corresponds to the Marxian ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ phase – which is a precursor to socialism – and in which class struggle continues and intensifies even under the disguise of different and antagonistic socialist policies. The collapse of the Soviet Union was the result of the gradual dominance of pro-capitalist tendencies in the CPSU. This paper offers a periodization of this struggle and an explanation of the mechanisms through which pro-capitalist tendencies – initially in quasi-capitalist forms and later overtly – took the upper hand. In this crucial is the distinction between the legal forms of ownership of the means of production and the actual control of them. From these premises, the main lessons for future socialist transitions that can be drawn from the soviet experience are (a) the continuous revolution process as the way through which an irreversible path to socialism can be paved and (b) the significance of realigning legal public ownership of the means of production with the actual control of their operation by the working class through democratic planning (the real subsumption of the means of production by labour).
The programme of the conference is the following.
9.30 – 09.50. Registration. Plekhanov House,
4-th Krasnoarmeysraya str. 1/33, Petersburg (Technological Institute metro st.)
09.50 – 11.20. Session 1. Moderator: Tatyana I. Filimonova.
Greetings: Vladimir GhennadievichGronsky, Gen. Director of the NLR
Michael-Matsas Savas. USSR and Imperialism: Back to the Future
Savran Sungur. The USSR: Peoples’ Federation of Nations
Schiappa Jean-Marc. Commune de Paris, “The State and Revolution” and the USSR
Buzgalin Alexander Vladimirovich. Citizens’ Social Creativity as the Justification for the Development of the USSR
11.20—11.30. Recess
11.30 – 12.50 Session 2. Moderator: Mikhail B. Konashev
Apanasenko Tatyana Evgenievna. The Soviet Economic Model for Substituting Exploitation and Incorporating Costs as a Guideline for the Future
Oreshnikov Vladimir Vyacheslavovich. USSR as the Result of the Great Socio-Economic Revolution, Carried Out Prior to Setting Up Necessary Economic Basis
Ogorodnikov Vladimir Petrovich. Objective Laws for the Development and of the Fall of the USSR
Pilipenko Igor Valerievich. The Dynamics of Residence Construction and the Solution of the Dwelling issue in the Republics of the USSR, 1920-1980
12.50—13.30. Recess
13.00 – 14.00. Session 3. Moderator: Mikhail B. Konashev
Kalous Antal. Anti-Sovietism in the Pre-war Period
Beolchi Luciano. The Break-up of the antifascist front. Origins of the Cold War in Italy (1945-1950).
Ossin Roman Sergueevich. Stalin’s Argument about Class Struggle Aggravation Under Socialist Conditions and the Experience of the Soviet society
14.00 – 15.00. Lunch
15.00 – 16.20. Session 4. Moderator: Tatyana I. Filimonova
Abramson Joseph Grigorievich. A combination of objective and subjective factors that led to the End of the Soviet Union
Epstein David Berkovich. Contradictions of the Socio-Economic Nature of the USSR and Causes of its Perishing
Kurenyshev Andrei Alexandrovich. On the Pitfalls that Eroded the USSR
Konashev Mikhail Borisovich. On Some Economic and Philosophical Aspects of the Evolution of the USSR
16.20—16.30. Recess
16.50-17.30. Discussions. Moderator: Mikhail B. Konashev
Plekhanov House, 1/33, 4-th Krasnoarmeysraya str., Saint-Petersburg (Technological Institute metro st.)
10.00 – 11.20. Session 5. Moderator: Tatiana Ivanovna Filimonova
Bugakov Mikhail Mikhailovich. The Lithuanian Irony of the “Perestroika»
Retinsky Stanislav Grigorievich. The Defeat of Socialism in the USSR and the Party as the Class Conscience carrier
Mavroudeas Stavros D. Soviet Union: A Socio-economic Type, Collapse and Lessons for the Future
Isaichikov Viktor Fedorovich. Is It Possible to “Come back” to the USSR, Under What Conditions, and to What Type of the Union?
11.20—11.30. Recess
11.30 – 12.30 Session 6. Moderator: Mikhail B. Konashev
Boreyko Anton Vladimirovich. «Collapse» of the USSR and «Perestroika» in Cuba: a «Special period» as an Alternative to the restoration of capitalism (1991-2000)
Koppe Renate. The growth of anti-communism and Russo phobia in the Politics of German Imperialism as a Result of the Collapse of the USSR
Pavlenko Vladimir Borisovich. The USSR, People’s Democratic Countries and Modern Russo – Chinese Alliance as Alternative Projects for the Historical Development of and for the XX-XXI Centuries
12.30—12.40. Recess
12.40 – 13.40. Session 7. Moderator: Mikhail B. Konashev
Arkhangelsky Vladimir Alekseevich. To Meet the Actual Crisis in Sociology is but Essential Condition for the Future Success for the Doers, carrying Common Interests of the Humankind.
Filimonova Tatiana Ivanovna. «Our Party»: on a Special Role of the Communist Party in a Social and Socialist Transformation of the Society
Gafurov Said Zakirovich. The Global Nature of Modern Capitalism and the Class Struggle in the Countries of the Former USSR
13.40 – 14.40. Lunch
14.40 – 17.00. Round Table «Left parties and Social Movements of the Republics of the Former USSR: Problems of Inter- and disintegration” Moderator: Tatiana I. Filimonova
Presentations by delegates from Belarusian, Georgian, Ukrainian and other republics of the USSR.
Temporal regulations: Presentations – 15 min; Questions – 5 min; Reviews – a 5 min speech
Presentations at the Round table
Key-speakers: 10 min, a 5 min finalizing talk
Presentation at the 3rd Marx World Congress organised by the School of Marxism, Peking University, Beijing 17-18 July 2021
ABSTRACT
I.I.Rubin’s Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value played a crucial role in the 1970s Value Debate between Marxist and neo-Ricardians as it gave inspiration and support to the Marxist argument about the social dimension of the political-economic analysis and also about the difference between Marx’s and Ricardo’s LTV. However, the subsequent self-proclaimed ‘Rubin school’ overemphasized the social dimension and neglected the technical dimension of value. This led to a theory of form without content by identifying immediately value with money and thus abandoning labour values and substituting them with monetary prices. This old ‘Rubin school’ betrayed both Marx and Rubin as the latter never ascribed to their fallacies. Nowadays, a new stream of ‘Rubinists’ (e.g. the proponents of a monetary theory of value) appear that again identify immediately labour values with money and thus also make labour values redundant. This paper argues that the new ‘Rubinists’ betray also both Marx and Rubin and, moreover, fail to understand the essential working of the capitalist economy.
The powerpoint of my presentation follows:
The video-recording of my presentation flows:
I will be one of the invited speakers at the annual INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POLITICAL ECONOMY (ICOPEC), which is organised by ICOPEC and is hosted this year by the Manisa Celal Bayar University (Manisa, Turkey).
I will speak at the first plenary meeting whose subject is ‘POLITICAL ECONOMY OF COVID-19 CRISIS AND ITS HANDLING‘ (Thursday 24/6/2021, 10:30 – 12:45 Athens time).
The theme of my contribution is ‘The Political Economy of COVID-19’.
Other participants in this plenary meeting are
2. ‘Capitalism after Covid’, Costas LAPAVITSAS (SOAS, University of London, UK)
The plenary can be assesed via the following ZOOM link:
Additional information and the full programme of the conference can be found at http://www.icopec.org/
Instituto Marxista de Economía
Stavros Mavroudeas Blog 